200 Million Americans Can Be Wrong

First published September 9, 2004, in Between the Lines. Gay-rights opponents are fond of noting that the majority of Americans are against same-sex marriage. This is a reasonable claim for them to make. For one thing, it’s true (although by increasingly narrow margins). Furthermore, it’s rhetorically effective. America is, in spirit if not always in… Continue reading 200 Million Americans Can Be Wrong

Nature? Nurture? It Doesn’t Matter

First published August 12, 2004, in Between the Lines One of the most persistent debates surrounding homosexuality regards whether gays are “born that way” or whether homosexuality is a “chosen lifestyle.” The debate is ill-formed from the start, in that it conflates two separate questions: 1. How did you become what you are? (By genetics?… Continue reading Nature? Nurture? It Doesn’t Matter

Is Homosexuality Harmful — and So What?

First published June 17, 2004, in Between the Lines The more things change, the more they stay the same. Or so it seems as gay-rights opponents, in a desperate last-ditch effort to win their cultural war against homosexuality, trot out arguments that have been discredited for decades. Many of these focus on the alleged harms… Continue reading Is Homosexuality Harmful — and So What?

Senator Kerry’s Marriage Contortions

First published October 1, 2003, in Between the Lines In a recent Advocate interview Massachusetts Senator and Democratic presidential hopeful John Kerry told reporter Chris Bull that, despite his otherwise strong support for gay rights, he could not bring himself to support gay marriage. In a previous Washington Post interview Kerry had stated, “Marriage is… Continue reading Senator Kerry’s Marriage Contortions

The Inclusive Santorum

First Published at Between the Lines on May 1, 2003 By now you’ve no doubt heard the flap about Senator Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania, who, in response to a question about whether homosexual persons should remain celibate, stated that “if the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual sex within your home,… Continue reading The Inclusive Santorum

Homosexuality and Morality, Part 6: The Virtue of Homosexuality

First Published at Between the Lines on February 7, 2003 I HAVE SPENT my last five columns — and a good deal of my career — defending homosexuality against various moral attacks. Yet sometimes I spend so much time explaining why homosexuality is “not bad” that I neglect to consider why it’s positively good. Can… Continue reading Homosexuality and Morality, Part 6: The Virtue of Homosexuality

Homosexuality and Morality, Part 5: Retaining the Moral High Ground

First Published at Between the Lines on January 23, 2003 OVER THE LAST MONTH I’ve been exploring various attempts to show that homosexuality is morally wrong. Not surprisingly, I’ve concluded that these anti-gay arguments don’t hold much water. At this point in the debate opponents usually try to change the subject. “Oh yeah?” they say.… Continue reading Homosexuality and Morality, Part 5: Retaining the Moral High Ground

Homosexuality and Morality, Part 4: The Unnaturalness Argument

First Published at Between the Lines on January 9, 2003. Based on the author’s article, “Why Shouldn’t Tommy and Jim Have Sex?” in Same Sex: Debating the Ethics, Science, and Culture of Homosexuality (Rowman & Littlefield, 1997). PEOPLE OFTEN ARGUE that homosexual sex is “unnatural.” But what does that mean? Many things we value —… Continue reading Homosexuality and Morality, Part 4: The Unnaturalness Argument