Articles

Homosexuality and Morality, Part 6: The Virtue of Homosexuality

First Published at Between the Lines on February 7, 2003 I HAVE SPENT my last five columns — and a good deal of my career — defending homosexuality against various moral attacks. Yet sometimes I spend so much time explaining why homosexuality is “not bad” that I neglect to consider why it’s positively good. Can […]

Homosexuality and Morality, Part 6: The Virtue of Homosexuality Read More »

Homosexuality and Morality, Part 5: Retaining the Moral High Ground

First Published at Between the Lines on January 23, 2003 OVER THE LAST MONTH I’ve been exploring various attempts to show that homosexuality is morally wrong. Not surprisingly, I’ve concluded that these anti-gay arguments don’t hold much water. At this point in the debate opponents usually try to change the subject. “Oh yeah?” they say.

Homosexuality and Morality, Part 5: Retaining the Moral High Ground Read More »

Homosexuality and Morality, Part 4: The Unnaturalness Argument

First Published at Between the Lines on January 9, 2003. Based on the author’s article, “Why Shouldn’t Tommy and Jim Have Sex?” in Same Sex: Debating the Ethics, Science, and Culture of Homosexuality (Rowman & Littlefield, 1997). PEOPLE OFTEN ARGUE that homosexual sex is “unnatural.” But what does that mean? Many things we value —

Homosexuality and Morality, Part 4: The Unnaturalness Argument Read More »

Homosexuality and Morality, Part 3: The Harm Arguments

First published at Between the Lines on December 19, 2002 The ancient Roman Emperor Justinian believed that homosexuality was the cause of earthquakes, plagues, famine, and various other maladies. Modern-day critics have been only slightly less creative in their allegations. Homosexuality has been blamed for the breakdown of the family, the AIDS crisis, sexual abuse

Homosexuality and Morality, Part 3: The Harm Arguments Read More »